Young v. McAteer

919 So. 2d 575, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 129, 2006 WL 47477
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 11, 2006
DocketNo. 3D05-606
StatusPublished

This text of 919 So. 2d 575 (Young v. McAteer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. McAteer, 919 So. 2d 575, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 129, 2006 WL 47477 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Floyd v. State, 913 So.2d 564 (Fla.2005); Yun Enters., Ltd. v. Graziani, 840 So.2d 420 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Hendry v. Zelaya, 841 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hendry v. Zelaya
841 So. 2d 572 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Floyd v. State
913 So. 2d 564 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
YUN ENTERPRISES, LTD. v. Graziani
840 So. 2d 420 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
919 So. 2d 575, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 129, 2006 WL 47477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-mcateer-fladistctapp-2006.