Young v. Matthiesen & Hegeler Zinc Co.

105 Ill. 26, 1882 Ill. LEXIS 231
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 20, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 105 Ill. 26 (Young v. Matthiesen & Hegeler Zinc Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Matthiesen & Hegeler Zinc Co., 105 Ill. 26, 1882 Ill. LEXIS 231 (Ill. 1882).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scholfield

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This appeal is simply from an order of the court below refusing to allow the appellants to become parties defendant to a hill in chancery filed against other parties. No final decree has been entered in the case, and until such decree is entered how can it possibly be known- that this refusal has .prejudiced appellants’ rights? It may be that decree will accomplish, without appellants’ intervention, precisely what they claim ought to be done. The order is clearly interlocutory, and therefore not the subject of an appeal. Racine and Mississippi R. R. Co. v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Co. 70 Ill. 249; Gage v. Eich et al. 56 id. 297; Woodside v. Woodside, 21 id. 207.

The appeal must he dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Trustees v. Timpone
190 N.E.2d 786 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1963)
Pfeiffer v. Kemper
244 Ill. App. 474 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 Ill. 26, 1882 Ill. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-matthiesen-hegeler-zinc-co-ill-1882.