Young v. Mathews Trucking Corp.

119 A.2d 239, 383 Pa. 464
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 3, 1956
DocketAppeal, 1
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 119 A.2d 239 (Young v. Mathews Trucking Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Mathews Trucking Corp., 119 A.2d 239, 383 Pa. 464 (Pa. 1956).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

TMs was a petition to strike off a judgment entered by default. It necessarily had to do with the regularity of the record under admitted facts, and could not be based upon any equities of the situation. The court declined to strike off the judgment but opened it, and the plaintiffs appealed.

This appeal is by the plaintiffs and not by the defendant, and there is not before this Court the validity of the ruling of the court below refusing to strike off the judgment: Bowser v. Citizens Light, Heat & Power Company, 267 Pa. 483, 489, 110 A. 372; Miller v. Wayne Title & Trust Company, 154 Pa. Superior Ct. 329, 338, 35 A. 2d 786.

Without the consent or even the knowledge of the parties, the court below converted the rule to strike into a rule to open, and thereupon made the rule absolute. This was error: Hamborsky v. Magyar Presbyterian Church (No.1), 78 Pa. Superior Ct. 519. See also Nixon v. Nixon, 329 Pa. 256, 263, 198 A. 154.

Before the court could open the judgment it was necessary for the petition to set forth (1) due diligence; *466 (2) the grounds for opening the judgment; and (3) the existence of a meritorious defense, by averring the facts upon which the meritorious defense is based: Planters Nut and Chocolate Company v. Brown-Murray Co., Inc., 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 239, 244, 193 A. 381. See also Britton v. Continental Mining and Smelting Corporation, 366 Pa. 82, 84, 76 A. 2d 625.

In addition, the appellee in the case at bar entered only a qualified appearance, and to open the judgment he must first submit himself to the jurisdiction of the court.

As was done in Rome Sales and Service Station v. Finch, 120 Pa. Superior Ct. 402, 404, 183 A. 54, we make the following order:

Order reversed, without prejudice to the appellee to present in 20 days a petition to the court below to open said judgment; that court to dispose of the same after taking whatever testimony may be necessary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sales and Marketing Group, Inc. v. PHRC
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
Comyn v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
594 A.2d 857 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)
Central Penn National Bank v. Williams
523 A.2d 1166 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
Kophazy v. Kophazy
421 A.2d 246 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Shainline v. Alberti Builders, Inc.
403 A.2d 577 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Baederwood Shopping Center, Inc. v. St. George & Co.
396 A.2d 642 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Ecumenical Enterprises, Inc. v. NADCO Construction, Inc.
385 A.2d 392 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Hofer v. Loyal Order of Moose of the World
365 A.2d 1254 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Telles v. Rose-Tex, Inc.
335 A.2d 440 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Slott v. Triad Distributors, Inc.
327 A.2d 151 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Alto-Reste Park Cemetery Ass'n
306 A.2d 881 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. Wenzel
289 A.2d 759 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)
Seltzer v. Ashton Hall Nursing & Convalescent Home
289 A.2d 207 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)
AB v. Continental Imports
281 A.2d 646 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
General Electric Credit Corp. v. Borosh
50 Pa. D. & C.2d 377 (Carbon County Court of Common Pleas, 1970)
Ellwood Consumer Discount Co. v. Agostino
39 Pa. D. & C.2d 324 (Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, 1966)
Hesselman v. Somerset Community Hospital
201 A.2d 302 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)
First National Bank v. Hollenbach
29 Pa. D. & C.2d 348 (Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, 1962)
Century Credit Co. v. JONES
173 A.2d 768 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 A.2d 239, 383 Pa. 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-mathews-trucking-corp-pa-1956.