Young v. Marine Ins. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Young v. Marine Ins. Co.

30 F. Cas. 850, 1 Cranch 566

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 15, 1809

StatusPublished

This text of 30 F. Cas. 850 (Young v. Marine Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Marine Ins. Co., 30 F. Cas. 850, 1 Cranch 566 (circtddc 1809).

Pincite

Opinion

In this case the jury had been out three days and two nights without separating, or agreeing, and on Friday last, the court finding them in a state of fixed disagreement, allowed them, (with the assent of the counsel for the defendants, and with an intimation on the part of the plaintiff’s counsel that no advantage would be taken by the plaintiff, but he would not consent,) to separate until Monday, (this day) having charged them to hold no conversation with any person out of court upon the subject of this suit. This morning Dr. Dick, a physician, came into court, and stated that one of the jurymen (Mr. Mandeville) was too ill- of a bilious attack to attend without danger to his life, and he did not think he would be able to attend for several days. The court having sat four weeks, and expecting to rise this week, and it being stated by the other jurors that there was no probability that they could agree, and the jury being called, and Mr. Mandeville not appearing, THE COURT discharged the other jurors and continued the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this case the jury had been out three days and two nights without separating, or agreeing, and on Friday last, the court finding them in a state of fixed disagreement, allowed them, (with the assent of the counsel for the defendants, and with an intimation on the part of the plaintiff’s counsel that no advantage would be taken by the plaintiff, but he would not consent,) to separate until Monday, (this day) having charged them to hold no conversation with any person out of court upon the subject of this suit. This morning Dr. Dick, a physician, came into court, and stated that one of the jurymen (Mr. Mandeville) was too ill- of a bilious attack to attend without danger to his life, and he did not think he would be able to attend for several days. The court having sat four weeks, and expecting to rise this week, and it being stated by the other jurors that there was no probability that they could agree, and the jury being called, and Mr. Mandeville not appearing, THE COURT discharged the other jurors and continued the cause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 F. Cas. 850, 1 Cranch 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-marine-ins-co-circtddc-1809.