Young v. Madison

Supreme Court

Young v. Madison

568 U.S. 1007, 133 S. Ct. 619

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 13, 2012

DocketNo. 12-6236

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 568 U.S. 1007 (Young v. Madison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Madison, 568 U.S. 1007, 133 S. Ct. 619 (2012).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Sotomayor and Justice [1008]*1008Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Sotomayor and Justice [1008]*1008Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 U.S. 1007, 133 S. Ct. 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-madison-scotus-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack