Young v. Liburd's Estates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Young v. Liburd's Estates, Inc.

3 A.D.2d 681, 160 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6613

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 681 (Young v. Liburd's Estates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Liburd's Estates, Inc., 3 A.D.2d 681, 160 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for rescission by purchasers of vacant land against the corporate seller, its president and another, it is alleged in the second cause of action that appellants fraudulently misrepresented to respondents that appellants “had a person or corporation ready, willing and able to loan and advance a sum of money, upon a bond and mortgage to be executed and delivered” by respondents for the erection of a residence upon the property. The appeal, as limited by appellants’ brief, is from so much of a resettled order as denied their motion to dismiss the second cause of action for insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 106, subd. 4). Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. Appellants may serve an answer, if so advised, within 20 days after the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for rescission by purchasers of vacant land against the corporate seller, its president and another, it is alleged in the second cause of action that appellants fraudulently misrepresented to respondents that appellants “had a person or corporation ready, willing and able to loan and advance a sum of money, upon a bond and mortgage to be executed and delivered” by respondents for the erection of a residence upon the property. The appeal, as limited by appellants’ brief, is from so much of a resettled order as denied their motion to dismiss the second cause of action for insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 106, subd. 4). Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. Appellants may serve an answer, if so advised, within 20 days after the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 681, 160 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-liburds-estates-inc-nyappdiv-1957.