Young v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway
This text of 98 A. 928 (Young v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the plaintiff was the owner of the team driven by the plaintiff in case of Taylor v. L. A. & W. St. Ry., and he seeks to recover damages for the injury to the team caused by the collision. The case is governed by the same rules of law as Taylor v. L. A. & W. St. Ry., and the judgment must be the same as the judgment in that case. Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 A. 928, 115 Me. 554, 1916 Me. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-lewiston-augusta-waterville-street-railway-me-1916.