Young v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway

98 A. 928, 115 Me. 554, 1916 Me. LEXIS 75
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided October 28, 1916·Published

Opinion

In this case the plaintiff was the owner of the team driven by the plaintiff in case of Taylor v. L. A. & W. St. Ry., and he seeks to recover damages for the injury to the team caused by the collision. The case is governed by the same rules of law as Taylor v. L. A. & W. St. Ry., and the judgment must be the same as the judgment in that case. Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway, 98 A. 928, 115 Me. 554, 1916 Me. LEXIS 75 (Me. 1916).

98 A. 928 (Young v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.