Young v. Lee
This text of Young v. Lee (Young v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 28392
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I Electronically Filed Supreme Court CATHERINE K. HAM YOUNG, 28392 Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, 04-OCT-2010 12:08 PM vs.
LARRY LEE, EDNA LEE, GARY LEE, PIERCE BROSNAN, and KEELY SHAYE-SMITH, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CIV. NO. 01-1-0140)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Duffy, J., for the court1)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee
Catherine K. Ham Young’s application for writ of certiorari,
filed on August 24, 2010, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 4, 2010.
FOR THE COURT:
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
Associate Justice
Harold Bronstein, for petitioner/plaintiff- appellant/cross-appellee, on the application
Dean E. Ochiai, Brenda E. Morris, Randall Y. Kaya, and Adrian Y. Chang for respondent/defendant- appellee/cross-appellant Gary Lee on the response
1 Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ. and Circuit Judge Chan, assigned by reason of vacancy. Ann H. Aratani for respondents/defendants- appellees/cross-appellants Larry Lee and Edna Lee on the response
Max W.J. Graham, Jr. and Teresa S. Tico for respondents/defendants- appellees/cross-appellants Pierce Brosnan and Keely Shaye-Smith on the response
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Young v. Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-lee-haw-2010.