Young v. Lamoute

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Young v. Lamoute

172 A.D.2d 517, 568 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4389

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 172 A.D.2d 517 (Young v. Lamoute) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Lamoute, 172 A.D.2d 517, 568 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4389 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated April 24, 1989, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2), an order of the same court, dated August 10, 1989 which denied her motion for leave to renew the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

On the record before us, we cannot say that the Supreme Court erred in dismissing the complaint and denying the plaintiff’s motion for renewal. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated April 24, 1989, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2), an order of the same court, dated August 10, 1989 which denied her motion for leave to renew the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

On the record before us, we cannot say that the Supreme Court erred in dismissing the complaint and denying the plaintiff’s motion for renewal. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 A.D.2d 517, 568 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-lamoute-nyappdiv-1991.