Young v. Knapp

900 So. 2d 839, 2005 La. LEXIS 1258, 2005 WL 995356
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 29, 2005·No. No. 2005-C-0269·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted. For the purpose of determining the issues raised by the exception of no cause of action, we are bound to accept as true all well-pleaded facts in the petition, not conclusions of law. Plaintiffs petition fails to set forth facts sufficient to allege a cause of action for malicious prosecution. Because plaintiff was previously allowed to amend his petition in an attempt to state a cause of action by order of the court of appeal,1 and we now find the amended petition fails to state a cause of action, remand for further amendment would serve no purpose. Therefore, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the district court is reinstated.

CALOGERO, C.J., and KIMBALL, J., dissent and would grant and docket.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Knapp, 900 So. 2d 839, 2005 La. LEXIS 1258, 2005 WL 995356 (La. 2005).

900 So. 2d 839 (Young v. Knapp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pylant v. Pylant
41 So. 3d 1282 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)