YOUNG v. KELLY
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
DA’VHON YOUNG,
Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 4:25cv321-MW/MAF
ROBERT KELLY and TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants. ___________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 4. Accordingly, upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the parties, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation, ECF No. 4, is accepted in part and rejected in part as this Court’s opinion, insofar as this Court exercises its inherent authority to dismiss this case for Plaintiff’s failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history. See McNair v. Johnson, 143 F. 4th 1301, 1308 (11th Cir. 2025). The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to this Court’s inherent authority to manage its docket, for Plaintiff’s failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history.” The Clerk shall close the file. SO ORDERED on August 19, 2025.
s/Mark E. Walker ____ United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
YOUNG v. KELLY (YOUNG v. KELLY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.