Young v. Jaffe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Young v. Jaffe

294 A.D.2d 495, 742 N.Y.S.2d 560, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5209

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 294 A.D.2d 495 (Young v. Jaffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Jaffe, 294 A.D.2d 495, 742 N.Y.S.2d 560, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5209 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence and architectural malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), entered June 29, 2001, as granted the motion of the defendant Sarah Stahl Jaffe, as Administrator C.T.A. of the estate of Norman Jaffe, to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against the estate on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitations.

[496]*496Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against the estate on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitations. O’Brien, J.P., Friedmann, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence and architectural malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), entered June 29, 2001, as granted the motion of the defendant Sarah Stahl Jaffe, as Administrator C.T.A. of the estate of Norman Jaffe, to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against the estate on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitations.

[496]*496Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against the estate on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitations. O’Brien, J.P., Friedmann, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.D.2d 495, 742 N.Y.S.2d 560, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-jaffe-nyappdiv-2002.