Young v. International Motor Co.

175 A.D. 949

Opinion

The facts of this case do not distinguish it from the rule expressed in McGuire v. Autocar Sales Co. (150 App. Div. 278). The judg[950]*950ment is reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. International Motor Co., 175 A.D. 949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

175 A.D. 949 (Young v. International Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGuire v. Autocar Sales Co.
150 A.D. 278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)