Young v. Industrial Commission

495 P.2d 870, 17 Ariz. App. 100, 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 630
Court of Appeals of Arizona·Decided April 20, 1972·No. No. 1 CA-IC 629·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HAIRE, Chief Judge, Division 1.

The sole question presented in this review by certiorari of a hearing officer’s award in a workmen’s compensation proceeding concerns whether “traveling expenses” are to be considered in the computation of the average monthly wage. The travel expenses here involved were “zone” travel expense allowances paid pursuant to union contract. The issues raised have been discussed and decided adversely to the petitioner in this Court’s opinion rendered in Moorehead v. Industrial Commission, 16 Moorehead v. Industrial Commission, 17 Ariz.App. 96, 495 P.2d 866 (filed April 19, 1972).

The award is affirmed.

EUBANK and JACOBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Industrial Commission, 495 P.2d 870, 17 Ariz. App. 100, 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 630 (Ark. Ct. App. 1972).

495 P.2d 870 (Young v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pinetop Truck & Equipment Supply v. Industrial Commission
776 P.2d 356 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1989)