Young v. Industrial Commission
This text of 495 P.2d 870 (Young v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole question presented in this review by certiorari of a hearing officer’s award in a workmen’s compensation proceeding concerns whether “traveling expenses” are to be considered in the computation of the average monthly wage. The travel expenses here involved were “zone” travel expense allowances paid pursuant to union contract. The issues raised have been discussed and decided adversely to the petitioner in this Court’s opinion rendered in Moorehead v. Industrial Commission, 16 Moorehead v. Industrial Commission, 17 Ariz.App. 96, 495 P.2d 866 (filed April 19, 1972).
The award is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
495 P.2d 870, 17 Ariz. App. 100, 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-industrial-commission-arizctapp-1972.