Young v. Hubbell
3 Johns. 430
This text of 3 Johns. 430 (Young v. Hubbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Young v. Hubbell, 3 Johns. 430 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).
Opinion
After the cause had gone to the jury, it ° _ . ought to have been decided by them. The justice had no right to interfere, and prevent their verdict. The judgment must be reversed.
Judgment reversed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Prentice v. Heiman
137 Misc. 832 (New York County Courts, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Johns. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-hubbell-nysupct-1808.