Young v. HP Enterprise Services

Fourth Circuit

Young v. HP Enterprise Services

471 F. App'x 133

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 12, 2012

DocketNo. 11-1946

StatusPublished

This text of 471 F. App'x 133 (Young v. HP Enterprise Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. HP Enterprise Services, 471 F. App'x 133 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Donna Young appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant in Young’s employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. HP Enter. Servs., No. 1:10-cv-01096-CMH-JFA, 2011 WL 3901881 (E.D.Va. Sept. 6, 2011) (Aug. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Donna Young appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant in Young’s employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. HP Enter. Servs., No. 1:10-cv-01096-CMH-JFA, 2011 WL 3901881 (E.D.Va. Sept. 6, 2011) (Aug. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

471 F. App'x 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-hp-enterprise-services-ca4-2012.