Young v. Houston

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. Houston. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 F.3d 194
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 20, 1997·No. 97-60109·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60109 Conference Calendar

JERRY LYNN YOUNG,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHRISTINE HOUSTON,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 4:94-CV-261 BD - - - - - - - - - - August 15, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerry Lynn Young, Mississippi inmate # 49329, appeals the

dismissal of his civil rights complaint, arguing that the

district court erred by concluding that the defendant did not

incorrectly determine his parole eligibility. A review of the

complaint reveals that Young has failed to allege the violation

of a constitutionally protected liberty interest. See Luken v.

Scott, 71 F.3d 192, 193 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-60109 - 2 -

1690 (1996); Irving v. Thigpen, 732 F.2d 1215, 1217-18 (5th Cir.

1984); Sandin v. Conner, 115 S. Ct. 2293, 2300 (1995).

Accordingly, we AFFIRM on that basis. See Sojourner T. v.

Edwards, 974 F.2d 27, 30 (5th Cir. 1992)(permitting affirmance of

judgment on any basis supported by the record).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Houston, (5th Cir. 1997).

Young v. Houston (Young v. Houston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sojourner T v. Edwards
974 F.2d 27 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
Luken v. Scott
71 F.3d 192 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
Sandin v. Conner
515 U.S. 472 (Supreme Court, 1995)