Young v. Holder
This text of 344 F. App'x 944 (Young v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lyndon Christopher Young, a citizen of Trinidad and Tobago, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). It found him to be ineligible for cancellation of removal because his 2006 New York marijuana possession conviction constituted an aggravated felony for purposes of immigration law. Young contends solely that the BIA erred by treating his conviction as equivalent to the federal offense of “recidivist possession.” See 21 U.S.C. § 844(a).
We conclude that the BIA correctly determined that Young’s offense constituted an aggravated felony for immigration law purposes. See Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 570 F.3d 263, 266-68 (5th Cir.2009), petition for cert. filed (July 15, 2009) (No. 09-60).
PETITION DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
344 F. App'x 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-holder-ca5-2009.