Young v. Hoglan

2 Cal. Unrep. 46
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. Hoglan. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Cal. 466
California Supreme Court·Decided December 10, 1877·No. No. 5720·Published

Opinion

By the COURT.

A settlement of the partnership accounts between Rogers and Powell, as contemplated at the time of the sale of the sheep by Powell to Hoglan, can only be made in a proceeding to which both Rogers and. Powell are parties.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to permit the parties to amend the pleadings so as to make Rogers and Powell parties to the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Hoglan, 2 Cal. Unrep. 46 (Cal. 1877).

2 Cal. Unrep. 46 (Young v. Hoglan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.