Young v. Hertz Corp.
496 So. 2d 175, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2073, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10152
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 30, 1986·No. 85-2222·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Lillian YOUNG, Appellant,
v.
The HERTZ CORPORATION, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Haddad, Josephs & Jack and Gary Gerrard, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Adams Hunter Angones Adams Adams & McClure and Christopher Lynch, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
The opinion of this court dated August 12, 1986, is withdrawn. We reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for *176 consideration in light of May v. Palm Beach Chemical Co., 77 So.2d 468 (Fla. 1955).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. Hertz Corp., 496 So. 2d 175, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2073, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10152 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
496 So. 2d 175 (Young v. Hertz Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lambert v. Indian River Electric, Inc.
551 So. 2d 518 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)