Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Young v. Hertz Corp.

Young v. Hertz Corp.

496 So. 2d 175, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2073, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10152
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 30, 1986
Docket85-2222
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 496 So. 2d 175 (Young v. Hertz Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Hertz Corp., 496 So. 2d 175, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2073, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10152 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

496 So.2d 175 (1986)

Lillian YOUNG, Appellant,
v.
The HERTZ CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 85-2222.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 30, 1986.
Rehearing Denied November 17, 1986.

Haddad, Josephs & Jack and Gary Gerrard, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Adams Hunter Angones Adams Adams & McClure and Christopher Lynch, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of this court dated August 12, 1986, is withdrawn. We reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for *176 consideration in light of May v. Palm Beach Chemical Co., 77 So.2d 468 (Fla. 1955).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lambert v. Indian River Electric, Inc.
551 So. 2d 518 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
496 So. 2d 175, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2073, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-hertz-corp-fladistctapp-1986.