Young v. Hector

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Young v. Hector

851 So. 2d 762, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9388, 2003 WL 21459268

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 2003

DocketNo. 3D03-1561

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 851 So. 2d 762 (Young v. Hector) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Hector, 851 So. 2d 762, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9388, 2003 WL 21459268 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Robert S. Young, seeks cer-tiorari review on a plethora of issues in this tortuously over-litigated case. By and large, we deny certiorari on all issues, save one. Because the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in freezing assets in a purported trust account without either a basis in the pleadings or the evidence, the order freezing the trust account proceeds is quashed. See Young v. Young, 816 So.2d 799 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); City of Miami Beach v. Swedroe, 788 So.2d 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Resil v. Resil, 755 So.2d 186 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

We further note that the trial court would not allow the petitioner, who was neither disrespectful nor disruptive, to speak to his attorney. The court stated: “No, you may not speak to your attorney in this hearing. You may give your attorney a note. Is that clear?” This, we believe is somewhat improper.

Certiorari granted, in part; order quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Robert S. Young, seeks cer-tiorari review on a plethora of issues in this tortuously over-litigated case. By and large, we deny certiorari on all issues, save one. Because the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in freezing assets in a purported trust account without either a basis in the pleadings or the evidence, the order freezing the trust account proceeds is quashed. See Young v. Young, 816 So.2d 799 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); City of Miami Beach v. Swedroe, 788 So.2d 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Resil v. Resil, 755 So.2d 186 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

We further note that the trial court would not allow the petitioner, who was neither disrespectful nor disruptive, to speak to his attorney. The court stated: “No, you may not speak to your attorney in this hearing. You may give your attorney a note. Is that clear?” This, we believe is somewhat improper.

Certiorari granted, in part; order quashed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

851 So. 2d 762, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9388, 2003 WL 21459268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-hector-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack