Young v. Hamilton
196 N.C. 818
Opinion
Pretermitting the question as to whether the defendant in her counterclaim has alleged facts sufficient to constitute a defense or a cause of action for deceit (Stone v. Milling Co., 192 N. C., 585, 135 S. E., 449), we are of opinion that the evidence offered in support thereof is too vague and indefinite or too gossamery to sustain such an action or to defeat plaintiff’s claim.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. Hamilton, 196 N.C. 818 (N.C. 1928).
196 N.C. 818 (Young v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stone v. Doctors' Lake Milling Co.
135 S.E. 449 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)