Young v. Groner

22 Wis. 205
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 22 Wis. 205 (Young v. Groner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Groner, 22 Wis. 205 (Wis. 1867).

Opinion

Paine, J.

The facts in regard to this appeal are stated in the opinion in the case of Jacob Groner, appellant, against Lewis Hield and others, respondents, (ante p. 200.) If we should entertain this appeal, it would be necessary to affirm the order, for the reasons given in that opinion.

It is doubtful whether this order, allowing an appeal to be taken from a decision of the county judge, was appealable at all. But, without determining that question, this appeal will be dismissed upon the ground that the appellant moved in the circuit court to dismiss the appeal from the decision of the county judge, and appealed from the order refusing to dismiss it, thus bringing two appeals for the same purpose. In such a case, the practice has been adopted, to dismiss one of the appeals. This was done in the case of Mead v. Walker, 20 Wis., 518, where the party appealed from a judgment and from an order refusing to vacate it. The report of the case does not- show that the appeal from the order was dismissed; but that fact will appear from the records. And it was dismissed upon the ground that a party ought not to be permitted to bring two appeals to obtain that which he can obtain, if at all, upon one.

By the Court. — The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oldland v. Oregon Coal & Nav. Co.
99 P. 423 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1909)
Wisconsin River Lumber Co. v. Plumer
6 N.W. 320 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1880)
State ex rel. Mulholland v. County Clerk of Manitowoc County
4 N.W. 121 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1880)
Victor Sewing Machine Co. v. Heller
41 Wis. 657 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1877)
American Button-Hole, Overseaming & Sewing Machine Co. v. Gurnee
38 Wis. 533 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1875)
Hopkins v. Hopkins
39 Wis. 166 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Wis. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-groner-wis-1867.