Young v. Griswold Manufacturing Co.

Third Circuit

Young v. Griswold Manufacturing Co.

23 F.2d 1007, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3310

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJanuary 12, 1928

DocketNo. 3710

StatusPublished

This text of 23 F.2d 1007 (Young v. Griswold Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Griswold Manufacturing Co., 23 F.2d 1007, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3310 (3d Cir. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The questions involved in this patent case are simply whether the patent involved invention and whether defendants infringe. All-important as these are to the litigants, the case involves no legal principles or patent law practice, and therefore nothing of interest to the profession or patentees generally. The judge below has exhaustively discussed the prior art and wherein this patentee inventively improved' upon it. The ease has had further full consideration by this court, and we are in full accord with the trial judge on the issues of invention and infringement.

In view of these facts, we find no warrant for another opinion, and therefore limit ourselves to affirming the decree below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The questions involved in this patent case are simply whether the patent involved invention and whether defendants infringe. All-important as these are to the litigants, the case involves no legal principles or patent law practice, and therefore nothing of interest to the profession or patentees generally. The judge below has exhaustively discussed the prior art and wherein this patentee inventively improved' upon it. The ease has had further full consideration by this court, and we are in full accord with the trial judge on the issues of invention and infringement.

In view of these facts, we find no warrant for another opinion, and therefore limit ourselves to affirming the decree below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 F.2d 1007, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-griswold-manufacturing-co-ca3-1928.