Young v. Green

251 F. App'x 224
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 18, 2007·No. No. 07-7195·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Clayton E. Young seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying reconsideration of the denial of his motion for appointment of counsel and denying his motion for discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Young seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Green, 251 F. App'x 224 (4th Cir. 2007).

251 F. App'x 224 (Young v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)