Young v. Great Am. Ins. Co. of New York

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Young v. Great Am. Ins. Co. of New York

602 S.E.2d 673, 359 N.C. 58

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 7, 2004

Docket54A04

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 602 S.E.2d 673 (Young v. Great Am. Ins. Co. of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Great Am. Ins. Co. of New York, 602 S.E.2d 673, 359 N.C. 58 (N.C. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

602 S.E.2d 673 (2004) 359 N.C. 58

Christopher YOUNG,
v.
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, City of Fayetteville, April S. Wortham, Ophelia Pechie, and Shannon Steck Peele.

No. 54A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 7, 2004.

*674 Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., by Susan K. Burkhart, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant Great American Insurance Company.

White & Stradley, L.L.P., by J. David Stradley, Raleigh, for defendant-appellees April S. Wortham, Ophelia Pechie, and Shannon Steck Peele.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

602 S.E.2d 673 (2004) 359 N.C. 58

Christopher YOUNG,
v.
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, City of Fayetteville, April S. Wortham, Ophelia Pechie, and Shannon Steck Peele.

No. 54A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 7, 2004.

*674 Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., by Susan K. Burkhart, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant Great American Insurance Company.

White & Stradley, L.L.P., by J. David Stradley, Raleigh, for defendant-appellees April S. Wortham, Ophelia Pechie, and Shannon Steck Peele.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

REVERSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

602 S.E.2d 673, 359 N.C. 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-great-am-ins-co-of-new-york-nc-2004.

Opinion

Christopher YOUNG, v. GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, City of Fayetteville, April S. Wortham, Ophelia Pechie, and Shannon Steck Peele.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Christopher YOUNG,
v.
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, City of Fayetteville, April S. Wortham, Ophelia Pechie, and Shannon Steck Peele.