Young v. Gilles

113 Mass. 34
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

By the common law, if the issue joined on a plea in abatement and decided in favor of the plaintiff was an issue of law tried by the court, the judgment was that the defendant answer over, and he might then set up any defence subsequent in the regular order of pleading; but if it was an issue of fact tried by the jury, final judgment was entered for [35]*35the plaintiff. Gould Pl. c. 5, § 159; c. 2, §§-36-43. Gage v. Graffam, 11 Mass. 181. Boston Glass Manufactory v. Langdon, 24 Pick. 49. By the new practice act, when an answer is overruled as insufficient in law, the defendant shall “ answer to the merits ” within such time as the court shall order; and even if an issue in fact upon an answer in abatement is found against him, he may, by special order of the court, have leave “ to answer over.” St. 1852, c. 312, §§ 28, 29. Gen. Sts. c. 129, §§ 39, 40. “ Answering over ” at common law embraces every form of denying the plaintiff’s right of action, whether by traverse or by demurrer. And the practice act, which substitutes, for all special pleas in bar, as well as for the general issue, in personal actions, “an answer to the declaration,” provides that this answer may contain a demurrer. St. 1852, c. 312, §§ 12, 17. Gen. Sts. c. 129, §§ 11, 15.

The rule of the Superior Court, requiring “ answers in demurrer ” to be filed at the first term, reserves power to the court to allow further time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Gilles, 113 Mass. 34 (Mass. 1873).

113 Mass. 34 (Young v. Gilles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krinsky v. Stevens Coal Sales Co.
36 N.E.2d 411 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Hobson v. Satterlee
40 N.E. 189 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
O'Loughlin v. Bird
128 Mass. 600 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)
Fisher v. Fraprie
125 Mass. 472 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1878)
Commonwealth v. Carr
114 Mass. 280 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)