Young v. Gamble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Young v. Gamble

90 N.Y.S. 1119

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 11, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment ordered in favor of plaintiff as follows: First, that James H. Gamble, in his last will and testament, conferred a power of appointment upon Charlotte M. Gamble; second, that Charlotte M. Gamble, in her last will and testament, made a valid execution of such power of appointment; third, that Frederick S. Gamble is entitled, upon distribution, to a legacy of $2,000, and that all the rest, residue, and remainder of both the personal and real estate of James H. Gamble and Charlotte M. Gamble passes to the plaintiff, Elizabeth Gamble Young, in her administrative and individual capacities, respectively. No costs allowed either party on this submission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment ordered in favor of plaintiff as follows: First, that James H. Gamble, in his last will and testament, conferred a power of appointment upon Charlotte M. Gamble; second, that Charlotte M. Gamble, in her last will and testament, made a valid execution of such power of appointment; third, that Frederick S. Gamble is entitled, upon distribution, to a legacy of $2,000, and that all the rest, residue, and remainder of both the personal and real estate of James H. Gamble and Charlotte M. Gamble passes to the plaintiff, Elizabeth Gamble Young, in her administrative and individual capacities, respectively. No costs allowed either party on this submission.

Young v. Gamble, 90 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

90 N.Y.S. 1119 (Young v. Gamble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.