Young v. Gamble

90 N.Y.S. 1119

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 1119 (Young v. Gamble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Gamble, 90 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment ordered in favor of plaintiff as follows: First, that James H. Gamble, in his last will and testament, conferred a power of appointment upon Charlotte M. Gamble; second, that Charlotte M. Gamble, in her last will and testament, made a valid execution of such power of appointment; third, that Frederick S. Gamble is entitled, upon distribution, to a legacy of $2,000, and that all the rest, residue, and remainder of both the personal and real estate of James H. Gamble and Charlotte M. Gamble passes to the plaintiff, Elizabeth Gamble Young, in her administrative and individual capacities, respectively. No costs allowed either party on this submission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 N.Y.S. 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-gamble-nyappdiv-1904.