Young v. Fruci
4 N.E.3d 363, 22 N.Y.3d 1037, 981 N.Y.S.2d 352, 2013 NY Slip Op 95438, 2013 WL 6851455, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 3479
This text of 4 N.E.3d 363 (Young v. Fruci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Young v. Fruci, 4 N.E.3d 363, 22 N.Y.3d 1037, 981 N.Y.S.2d 352, 2013 NY Slip Op 95438, 2013 WL 6851455, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 3479 (N.Y. 2013).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [1929, Cardozo, Ch. J.]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
169 N.E. 386 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 N.E.3d 363, 22 N.Y.3d 1037, 981 N.Y.S.2d 352, 2013 NY Slip Op 95438, 2013 WL 6851455, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 3479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-fruci-ny-2013.