Young v. Friedel

247 A.D.2d 613, 669 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1751

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), dated December 6, 1996, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff was assaulted on a public street outside his workplace. The plaintiff failed to establish prima facie that but for the defendants’ failure to install a working telephone inside his workplace, the assault would not have taken place (see, Melville v New York City Hous. Auth., 242 AD2d 244).

Accordingly, we grant summary judgment to the defendants dismissing the complaint.

O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Friedel, 247 A.D.2d 613, 669 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1751 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 613 (Young v. Friedel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melville v. New York City Housing Authority
242 A.D.2d 244 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)