Young v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

22 So. 3d 658, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16004, 2009 WL 3430202
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 27, 2009
DocketNo. 1D09-4686
StatusPublished

This text of 22 So. 3d 658 (Young v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 22 So. 3d 658, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16004, 2009 WL 3430202 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, we are required to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Because appellant alleges, however, that she was misadvised by an employee of the Unemployment Appeals Commission concerning the requirement that the notice of appeal be timely filed rather than merely timely mailed, this disposition is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief [659]*659by filing a motion with the Unemployment Appeals Commission requesting that it vacate and reenter the final order at issue. See Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp., 721 So.2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KAHN, BENTON, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp.
721 So. 2d 399 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 So. 3d 658, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16004, 2009 WL 3430202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2009.