Young v. Fega
This text of 246 A.D. 827 (Young v. Fega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action on a bond and mortgage, the lien- of which was junior to that of a mortgage previously foreclosed and which extinguished the security for the bond and mortgage in suit. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and judgment entered pursuant thereto, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Weisel v. Hagdahl Realty Co., Inc., 241 App. Div. 314; Brenek v. Bednar, 243 id. 622; Shields v. DiGiacomo, ante, p. 826, decided herewith.) Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-fega-nyappdiv-1936.