Young v. . Farrel

Superior Court of North Carolina

Young v. . Farrel

3 N.C. 219

DecidedOctober 5, 1802

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 219 (Young v. . Farrel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. . Farrel, 3 N.C. 219 (N.C. Ct. App. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

Hal}, Judge.

As to tbe evidence in the first place, it cannot be regarded by the jury ; they have nothing to do with it: And as' to the replication, the act of 1715 is in force ; the jury are to say •whether the act bars the plaintiff’s claim.

From this charge, the reporter inferred the opinion of his Honor to be, that the replication thus entered was to be considered as a general one, denying the matter of the plea, and not as introducing any new matter by way of avoidance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hal}, Judge.

As to tbe evidence in the first place, it cannot be regarded by the jury ; they have nothing to do with it: And as' to the replication, the act of 1715 is in force ; the jury are to say •whether the act bars the plaintiff’s claim.

From this charge, the reporter inferred the opinion of his Honor to be, that the replication thus entered was to be considered as a general one, denying the matter of the plea, and not as introducing any new matter by way of avoidance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.C. 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-farrel-ncsuperct-1802.