Young v. Ewing

Supreme Court of Georgia

Young v. Ewing

71 S.E. 5, 136 Ga. 172, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 465

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 13, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 S.E. 5 (Young v. Ewing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Ewing, 71 S.E. 5, 136 Ga. 172, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 465 (Ga. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Lumpkin* J.

1. The evidence did not demand a verdict in favor of the party in whose favor it was found, and the first grant of a new trial will not be reversed. Cox v. Grady, 132 Ga. 368 (64 S. E. 262).

2. As the grant of a new trial is affirmed, the cross-bill of exceptions is dismissed, without prejudice to the right of the defendant in error in regard to a future determination of his exceptions pendente lite. Armour & Co. v. Burkhalter, 130 Ga. 370 (60 S. E. 850); Purser v. Thompson, 135 Ga. 732 (70 S. E. 569).

[173]*173April 13, 1911.

Complaint. Before Judge Whipple. Irwin superior court. June 22, 1910.

A. J. McDonald, E. J. Quincey, and Eaygood & Gutts, for plaintiff. L. Kennedy and OÍis E. Elkins, for defendants.

Judgment on main bill of exceptions affirmed. Gross-bill of exceptions dismissed, icithout prejudice.

All the Jttstices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI