Young v. Espada

95 A.D.3d 1478, 944 N.Y.S.2d 664
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 10, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 95 A.D.3d 1478 (Young v. Espada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Espada, 95 A.D.3d 1478, 944 N.Y.S.2d 664 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Lathinen, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Pines, J.), entered June 3, 2911, which, among other things, dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant Family Ct Act article 6, for supervised visitation with his children.

While incarcerated at the Broome County Jail, petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking supervised visitation with his children at that facility. Family Court dismissed his petition without prejudice to his right to reapply once assigned to a state correctional facility. On this appeal, petitioner’s counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal.

Petitioner’s transfer from the Broome County Jail to a state correctional facility, where he is now serving a 20-year sentence for second degree murder, renders this appeal moot (cf. Matter of Boore v Parks, 63 AD3d 1307, 1307 [2009]). The proper course would be for petitioner to file a new petition that would afford Family Court an opportunity to evaluate the children’s best [1479]*1479interests under petitioner’s current circumstances (see id. at 1307-1308). Because the appeal is moot, we need not address counsel’s application to be relieved of her assignment (see Matter of Kimberly C. [Norman C.], 92 AD3d 985 [2012]; Matter of Alexander K. [Jennifer N.], 77 AD3d 1023, 1024 [2010]).

Peters, PJ., Rose, Malone Jr. and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Rumpel v. Powell
129 A.D.3d 1344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Samantha WW. v. Gerald XX.
107 A.D.3d 1313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A.D.3d 1478, 944 N.Y.S.2d 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-espada-nyappdiv-2012.