Young v. Era Advantage

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. Era Advantage. Read the opinion of the Court — 2022 MT 138
Montana Supreme Court·Decided September 28, 2021·No. DA 21-0434·Unpublished

Opinion

09/28/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0434

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0434

JODIE YOUNG,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. SECOND ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT ERA ADVANTAGE REALTY,

Defendant and Appellee.

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4), (c), On September 27, 2021, D. Patrick McKittrick was appointed as Mediator. He has since informed this office that he must decline the appointment.

ACCORDINGLY, the appointment of Mr. McKittrick is rescinded, and: IT IS ORDERED THAT CURTIS G. THOMPSON, whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this 28th day of September, 2021.

Bowen Greenwood,

Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Brett Patrick Clark, Brian James Miller, Curtis G. Thompson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Era Advantage, (Mo. 2021).

Young v. Era Advantage (Young v. Era Advantage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.