Young v. Department of Highways

West Virginia Court of Claims

Young v. Department of Highways

13 Ct. Cl. 268

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedOctober 10, 1980

DocketCC-80-246

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ct. Cl. 268 (Young v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Department of Highways, 13 Ct. Cl. 268 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted upon a written stipulation to the effect that the respondent is liable for damages in the sum of $610.48. On [269]*269or about February 8, 1980, claimant was operating his 1972 Ford Mustang in an easterly direction on Interstate 64 in South Charleston, Kanawha County, West Virginia. While traveling on 1-64 claimant crossed a bridge owned and maintained by the respondent. On the bridge, claimant’s vehicle struck a loose metal expansion joint which burst a rear tire, causing the vehicle to go into a spin and strike a guardrail. As a result, the left quarter panel and door were damaged. The respondent’s negligence in failing to properly maintain the bridge was the proximate cause of the damages suffered by the claimant.

In view of the foregoing facts, the Court hereby finds the respondent liable, and makes an award to the claimant in the amount stipulated.

Award of $610.48.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted upon a written stipulation to the effect that the respondent is liable for damages in the sum of $610.48. On [269]*269or about February 8, 1980, claimant was operating his 1972 Ford Mustang in an easterly direction on Interstate 64 in South Charleston, Kanawha County, West Virginia. While traveling on 1-64 claimant crossed a bridge owned and maintained by the respondent. On the bridge, claimant’s vehicle struck a loose metal expansion joint which burst a rear tire, causing the vehicle to go into a spin and strike a guardrail. As a result, the left quarter panel and door were damaged. The respondent’s negligence in failing to properly maintain the bridge was the proximate cause of the damages suffered by the claimant.

In view of the foregoing facts, the Court hereby finds the respondent liable, and makes an award to the claimant in the amount stipulated.

Award of $610.48.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ct. Cl. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1980.