Young v. Convergys Customer Management Group Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Young v. Convergys Customer Management Group Inc.

439 S.W.3d 819, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 928, 2014 WL 4198242

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 26, 2014·No. No. ED 100894·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carmen Young appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the “Commission”) finding she did not show good cause for filing a late appeal of the determination that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. We find that no abuse of discretion has occurred.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carmen Young appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the “Commission”) finding she did not show good cause for filing a late appeal of the determination that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. We find that no abuse of discretion has occurred.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Young v. Convergys Customer Management Group Inc., 439 S.W.3d 819, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 928, 2014 WL 4198242 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

439 S.W.3d 819 (Young v. Convergys Customer Management Group Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.