Young v. Collier

Fourth Circuit

Young v. Collier

252 F. App'x 575

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 31, 2007·No. No. 07-6475·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert E. Young appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and [576]*576find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Young v. Collier, No. 6:03-cv-3640, 2006 WL 2706965 (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2006 & Mar. 23, 2007). Further, we deny Young’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert E. Young appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and [576]*576find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Young v. Collier, No. 6:03-cv-3640, 2006 WL 2706965 (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2006 & Mar. 23, 2007). Further, we deny Young’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Young v. Collier, 252 F. App'x 575 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

252 F. App'x 575 (Young v. Collier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related