Young v. Colbath
559 So. 2d 1217, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2016, 1990 WL 35440
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 21, 1990·No. No. 90-0622·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
By order dated March 9, 1990, this court determined that the pleading filed by petitioner, entitled petition for writ of prohibition, should be treated as a petition for writ of mandamus. Now upon further consideration of the pro se petition, as amended, and the response, we are of the opinion that correctly the petition should be denominated as petition for writ of prohibition and, accordingly, that part of the order dated March 9, 1990, providing otherwise is hereby rescinded.
The amended petition of writ of prohibition is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. Colbath, 559 So. 2d 1217, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2016, 1990 WL 35440 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
559 So. 2d 1217 (Young v. Colbath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Contella v. Contella
559 So. 2d 1217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)