Young v. Colbath
This text of 559 So. 2d 1217 (Young v. Colbath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By order dated March 9, 1990, this court determined that the pleading filed by petitioner, entitled petition for writ of prohibition, should be treated as a petition for writ of mandamus. Now upon further consideration of the pro se petition, as amended, and the response, we are of the opinion that correctly the petition should be denominated as petition for writ of prohibition and, accordingly, that part of the order dated March 9, 1990, providing otherwise is hereby rescinded.
The amended petition of writ of prohibition is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
559 So. 2d 1217, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2016, 1990 WL 35440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-colbath-fladistctapp-1990.