Young v. Colbath

559 So. 2d 1217, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2016, 1990 WL 35440
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 21, 1990
DocketNo. 90-0622
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 559 So. 2d 1217 (Young v. Colbath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Colbath, 559 So. 2d 1217, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2016, 1990 WL 35440 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By order dated March 9, 1990, this court determined that the pleading filed by petitioner, entitled petition for writ of prohibition, should be treated as a petition for writ of mandamus. Now upon further consideration of the pro se petition, as amended, and the response, we are of the opinion that correctly the petition should be denominated as petition for writ of prohibition and, accordingly, that part of the order dated March 9, 1990, providing otherwise is hereby rescinded.

The amended petition of writ of prohibition is

DENIED.

DOWNEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Contella v. Contella
559 So. 2d 1217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
559 So. 2d 1217, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2016, 1990 WL 35440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-colbath-fladistctapp-1990.