Young v. City of Daytona Beach Shores

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Young v. City of Daytona Beach Shores

61 So. 3d 1281, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7743, 2011 WL 2097693

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 27, 2011

Docket5D10-1723

StatusPublished

This text of 61 So. 3d 1281 (Young v. City of Daytona Beach Shores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. City of Daytona Beach Shores, 61 So. 3d 1281, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7743, 2011 WL 2097693 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this negligence action, Norman Young appeals from a summary final judgment entered in favor of Cahuenga Associates II, Ltd. Following our de novo review, see Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach L.P., 760 So.2d 126, 130 (Fla.2000), we conclude, as the trial court did, that there are no material issues of disputed fact and that Cahuenga was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this negligence action, Norman Young appeals from a summary final judgment entered in favor of Cahuenga Associates II, Ltd. Following our de novo review, see Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach L.P., 760 So.2d 126, 130 (Fla.2000), we conclude, as the trial court did, that there are no material issues of disputed fact and that Cahuenga was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 So. 3d 1281, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7743, 2011 WL 2097693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-city-of-daytona-beach-shores-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack