Young v. Cargill Juice North America, Inc.
This text of 343 F. App'x 585 (Young v. Cargill Juice North America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a personal injury case. The district court granted defendant summary judgment on the ground that defendant was plaintiffs statutory employer and entitled to immunity from suit pursuant to Florida’s Workers’ Compensation Act. Plaintiff appeals, contending that the “intentional tort” exception to such immunity applies and that material issues of fact remain to be litigated regarding that exception. We disagree, and therefore affirm. The intentional tort exception does not apply for the reasons stated in the district court’s December 15, 2008, 2008 WL 5235133, order granting appellee summary judgment.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
343 F. App'x 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-cargill-juice-north-america-inc-ca11-2009.