Young v. Burnett

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Young v. Burnett

127 A. 435, 81 N.H. 163, 1923 N.H. LEXIS 42

DecidedDecember 4, 1923

StatusPublished

This text of 127 A. 435 (Young v. Burnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Burnett, 127 A. 435, 81 N.H. 163, 1923 N.H. LEXIS 42 (N.H. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Parsons, C. J.

The plaintiff’s right of action accrued against the defendant when he paid the notes. He therefore can maintain this action, the payment being made within six years from the date of the writ, even if the holder of the notes could not here maintain a suit thereon against the defendant. Whipple v. Stevens, 19 N. H. 150; Boardman v. Paige, 11 N. H. 431; Peaslee v. Breed, 10 N. H. 489.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parsons, C. J.

The plaintiff’s right of action accrued against the defendant when he paid the notes. He therefore can maintain this action, the payment being made within six years from the date of the writ, even if the holder of the notes could not here maintain a suit thereon against the defendant. Whipple v. Stevens, 19 N. H. 150; Boardman v. Paige, 11 N. H. 431; Peaslee v. Breed, 10 N. H. 489.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 A. 435, 81 N.H. 163, 1923 N.H. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-burnett-nh-1923.