Young v. Blatt

Fourth Circuit

Young v. Blatt

574 F. App'x 265

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 2, 2014·No. No. 13-2470·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric J. Young appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Blatt, No. 5:13-cv-00089-FPS-JES, 2013 WL 5961090 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric J. Young appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Blatt, No. 5:13-cv-00089-FPS-JES, 2013 WL 5961090 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Young v. Blatt, 574 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

574 F. App'x 265 (Young v. Blatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related