Young v. Black

District of Columbia

Young v. Black

1 D.C. 432

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 15, 1807

StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 432 (Young v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Black, 1 D.C. 432 (D.D.C. 1807).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court,

upon the prayer of Mr. Swann, for the defendant, decided (nem. con.) that the plaintiffs, Young and Beblois, could not recover without evidence of an express promise to pay them their proportion of the damages for the breaches alleged. And that the orders, &c. were not evidence of such express promise, nor were they evidence on either of the three last counts. The plaintiffs became nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court,

upon the prayer of Mr. Swann, for the defendant, decided (nem. con.) that the plaintiffs, Young and Beblois, could not recover without evidence of an express promise to pay them their proportion of the damages for the breaches alleged. And that the orders, &c. were not evidence of such express promise, nor were they evidence on either of the three last counts. The plaintiffs became nonsuit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 D.C. 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-black-dcd-1807.