Young v. Black

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Young v. Black

30 F. Cas. 841, 1 Cranch 432

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided July 15, 1807·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THE COURT,

upon the prayer of Mr. Swann, for the defendant, decided (nem. con.) that the plaintiffs, Young and Deblois, could not recover without evidence of an express promise to pay them their proportion of the damages for the breaches alleged. And that the orders, &e., were not evidence of such express promise, nor were they evidence on either of the three last counts. The plaintiffs became nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT,

upon the prayer of Mr. Swann, for the defendant, decided (nem. con.) that the plaintiffs, Young and Deblois, could not recover without evidence of an express promise to pay them their proportion of the damages for the breaches alleged. And that the orders, &e., were not evidence of such express promise, nor were they evidence on either of the three last counts. The plaintiffs became nonsuit.

Young v. Black, 30 F. Cas. 841, 1 Cranch 432 (circtddc 1807).

Pincite

30 F. Cas. 841 (Young v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related