Young v. Black

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Young v. Black

30 F. Cas. 841, 1 Cranch 432

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 15, 1807

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 F. Cas. 841 (Young v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Black, 30 F. Cas. 841, 1 Cranch 432 (circtddc 1807).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT,

upon the prayer of Mr. Swann, for the defendant, decided (nem. con.) that the plaintiffs, Young and Deblois, could not recover without evidence of an express promise to pay them their proportion of the damages for the breaches alleged. And that the orders, &e., were not evidence of such express promise, nor were they evidence on either of the three last counts. The plaintiffs became nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT,

upon the prayer of Mr. Swann, for the defendant, decided (nem. con.) that the plaintiffs, Young and Deblois, could not recover without evidence of an express promise to pay them their proportion of the damages for the breaches alleged. And that the orders, &e., were not evidence of such express promise, nor were they evidence on either of the three last counts. The plaintiffs became nonsuit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 F. Cas. 841, 1 Cranch 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-black-circtddc-1807.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack