Young v. Bertram

398 S.W.2d 504
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedFebruary 4, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 398 S.W.2d 504 (Young v. Bertram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Bertram, 398 S.W.2d 504 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Upon appearing for arraignment in the Taylor Circuit Court on 12 felony indictments against him charging misapplication of public funds, E. Poe Young, County Court Clerk of Taylor County, filed an affidavit alleging that the circuit judge was prejudiced against him and moved that the judge vacate the bench. The judge failed to vacate the bench whereupon Young brought the instant original proceeding in this Court seeking an order prohibiting the circuit judge from proceeding further in the prosecution under the indictment.

The respondent judge does not question the sufficiency of the motion and affidavit or assert any reason why he should not vacate the bench. 'His only contention is that any error in his failure to vacate can be remedied by appeal and therefore this Court should not invoke the extraordinary power of prohibition.

It is our opinion that in the circumstances here presented the remedy by appeal would not be adequate. Cf. Farley v. Lowe, Ky., 382 S.W.2d 409. Accordingly, we invoke the original jurisdiction of this Court.

The respondent hereby is prohibited from acting as judge of the Taylor Circuit Court in any further proceedings on the indictments against Young.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Middle States Coal Co. v. Cornett
584 S.W.2d 593 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
398 S.W.2d 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-bertram-kyctapp-1966.