Young v. Bell
30 F. Cas. 840, 1 Cranch 342
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedJuly 15, 1806
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 30 F. Cas. 840 (Young v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Young v. Bell, 30 F. Cas. 840, 1 Cranch 342 (circtddc 1806).
Opinion
having taken time to consider, decided (nem. con.) that infancy cannot be given in evidence, on the plea of nil debet to an action of debt on a promissory note, being of opinion that it is not void, but voidable. See Hyer v. Hyatt [Case No. 6,977], at Washington, December, 1827.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hyer v. Hyatt
12 F. Cas. 1117 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1827)
Abercrombie v. Dupuis
5 U.S. 342 (Supreme Court, 1803)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 F. Cas. 840, 1 Cranch 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-bell-circtddc-1806.