Young v. Bell
30 F. Cas. 840, 1 Cranch 342
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided July 15, 1806·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
having taken time to consider, decided (nem. con.) that infancy cannot be given in evidence, on the plea of nil debet to an action of debt on a promissory note, being of opinion that it is not void, but voidable. See Hyer v. Hyatt [Case No. 6,977], at Washington, December, 1827.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. Bell, 30 F. Cas. 840, 1 Cranch 342 (circtddc 1806).
30 F. Cas. 840 (Young v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hyer v. Hyatt
12 F. Cas. 1117 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1827)
Abercrombie v. Dupuis
5 U.S. 342 (Supreme Court, 1803)