Young v. Arndt
1 How. Pr. 227
This text of 1 How. Pr. 227 (Young v. Arndt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Young v. Arndt, 1 How. Pr. 227 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
Opinion
Plaintiffs counsel insisted that the affidavit should have read; “ without whose testimony and the testimony of each and every of them, &c.” 3 Wend., 19 Wend.
The affidavit does not seem to come within the rule, in that respect. Motion denied, with costs, without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Haxton v. Bishop
3 Wend. 13 (New York Supreme Court, 1829)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-arndt-nysupct-1845.