Young (Terrell) Vs. State

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 2, 2021
Docket83623
StatusPublished

This text of Young (Terrell) Vs. State (Young (Terrell) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young (Terrell) Vs. State, (Neb. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TERRELL COCHISE YOUNG, No. 83623 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, MED Respondent. NOV (1 2021 ET A. BROWN E COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CA PRI<

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for trial transcripts. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Monica Trujillo, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a rnotion for trial transcripts, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal, see Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990), and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

arraguirre

J. , J. Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Monica Trujillo, District Judge Terrell Cochise Young Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT Of NEVADA

10) 1947A 3i432-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Young (Terrell) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-terrell-vs-state-nev-2021.